Social support for smoking cessation has been identified as a key fact
or differentiating which individuals are most likely to quit smoking.
Attempts to enhance social support in clinic-based programs have gener
ally been unsuccessful. This study investigated a strategy for increas
ing the involvement of supportive others among participants in a commu
nity-based smoking-cessation contest. These smokers were undertaking q
uit attempts without the supportive environment offered in clinic-base
d group programs. Subjects included 734 adult smokers who had particip
ated in a smoking-cessation contest in their local community. Contest
participants had the option of designating a ''support person'' who wo
uld assist them in quitting smoking and be eligible for prizes if the
participant was a contest winner. Follow-up was by telephone survey 3
months after the end of the contest. No differences were observed in d
emographic or smoking history variables between those who did and did
not elect to name a support person. A relatively high proportion (60%)
of contest participants elected to identify a support person, and sel
f-reported smoking-cessation rates were significantly better among tho
se who named a support person than among those who did not. Identifyin
g a support person was a particularly effective strategy for those wit
h smoking or nonsupportive spouses. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Scienc
e Ltd