Many observers have lamented the fact that sociology continues to frag
ment into a number of allegedly incompatible theoretical camps. To cou
ntervail such sectarian tendencies. I suggest that we return to the wr
itings of key thinkers in our field--here specifically Erving Goffman-
and search for those findings, observations, concepts, or analyses whi
ch have found purchase across the discipline and which seemingly defy
the forces of theoretical balkanization. This interparadigmatic dialog
ue on Goffman can be realized only if a concerted effort is made to br
ing together representatives of sociology's major theory groups to dis
cuss their possibly varying interpretations of Goffman. Problems assoc
iated with launching such a unification project are discussed.