While the importance of metatheory for theory growth has received some
attention from sociologists, the importance of methodological prefere
nces has been overlooked. We examine an influential model of theory gr
owth in social science. This model focuses on theory. We show how rece
nt work in the sociology of science suggests an equally important plac
e for methodological preference in guiding social research. Bringing i
n method allows us to recognize that what often passes for fundamental
metatheoretical differences among subfields in sociology actually con
sists of minor squabbles over resource allocation. We show that not on
ly does social theory grow strategically through theoretical research
programs, but that the different forms of theoretical work in sociolog
y serve to integrate the work of diverse researchers in a less efficie
nt but still effective manner.