Ms. Elliot et al., PROBLEMS WITH INTERPRETATION OF SEROLOGICAL ASSAYS IN A VIRUS SURVEY OF ORCHID SPECIES FROM PUERTO-RICO, ECUADOR, AND FLORIDA, Plant disease, 80(10), 1996, pp. 1160-1164
Leaf samples collected in May 1990 from wild and cultivated orchids in
Puerto Rico were tested for odontoglossum ringspot virus (ORBV), cymb
idium mosaic virus (CymMV), tobacco mosaic virus common strain, tobacc
o mild green mosaic virus. two strains of cucumber mosaic virus, and c
ymbidium ringspot virus (CymRSV) with sodium dodecyl sulfate immunodif
fusion, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and/or Western blot
(immunoblot) procedures. Leaf tissue from orchids cultivated in Gaine
sville, FL, and from the wild in Ecuador were similarly tested. No vir
us was detected in the 277 wild orchids, and only ORSV, CymMV, or both
ORSV and CymMV were detected in 20, 73, and 22 cultivated orchids, re
spectively, from Puerto Rico and Florida. Several orchid plants gave E
LISA reactions greater than three times the negative control with all
the virus antisera tested. Other methods did not confirm the presence
of virus in these plants, however. Indeed, several preimmune sera also
reacted with some of these plants. Caution must be used in interpreta
tion of low ELISA values even when these reactions are clearly greater
than those of uninfected controls. These results illustrate the need
to utilize more than one diagnostic technique before discarding a valu
able orchid plant.