Mm. Knudson et al., USE OF LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN IN PREVENTING THROMBOEMBOLISM IN TRAUMA PATIENTS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 41(3), 1996, pp. 446-459
Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of low molecula
r weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in
high-risk trauma patients, compared with mechanical methods of prophyl
axis. Design: A prospective randomized trial conducted over a 19-month
period in an urban, academic trauma center. Methods: All trauma patie
nts with the following risk factors for the development of DVT were co
nsidered for enrollment in this study: any injury with an Abbreviated
Injury Scale score greater than or equal to 3; major head injury (Glas
gow Coma Scale score less than or equal to 8); spine, pelvic, or lower
extremity fractures; acute venous injury; or age >50 gears, After a s
creening venous duplex examination, the patients were assigned to a He
parin versus No-Heparin group, depending upon the presence of injuries
precluding the use of heparin, In the Heparin group, the patients wer
e then randomized to receive either LMWH or optimal mechanical compres
sion (defined as bilateral sequential gradient pneumatic compression (
SCD) or, in the presence of lower extremity injuries precluding the us
e of the SCD, the arteriovenous impulse (AVI) compression system), All
the patients in the No-Heparin group received optimal compression, En
rolled patients underwent sequential duplex examinations every 5 to 7
days until discharge. Results: Of the 487 consecutive patients initial
ly enrolled in this study, 372 were available for at least the first t
wo duplex examinations and comprise the study population, Only nine (2
.4%) patients developed DVT, compared with the predicted 9.1% rate in
high-risk trauma patients receiving no prophylaxis (p = 0.037). Of the
120 patients who were randomized to receive LMWH, only one (0.8%) dev
eloped DVT. In the SCD group, there were 5 of 199 patients (2.5%) with
DVT, and 3 of 53 (5.7%) in the AVI group, One patient with DVT also h
ad clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism, but there were no deaths s
econdary to pulmonary embolism, There was one major bleeding complicat
ion potentially associated with the use of LMWH. Conclusions: The admi
nistration of LMWH is a safe and extremely effective method of prevent
ing DVT in high-risk trauma patients, When heparin is contraindicated,
aggressive attempts at mechanical compression are warranted.