Ta. Zwolan et al., PATIENT PERFORMANCE WITH THE COCHLEAR-CORPORATION 20-IMPLANT - BIPOLAR VERSUS MONOPOLAR ACTIVATION(2), The American journal of otology, 17(5), 1996, pp. 717-723
A within-subjects comparison of monopolar versus bipolar stimulation w
as performed using a modified version of the Nucleus mini-22 cochlear
implant, the Nucleus ''20 + 2'' implant. Six subjects underwent implan
tation with this device, which is identical to the Nucleus 22 cochlear
implant with the addition of two extracochlear indifferent electrodes
. These electrodes provide two monopolar modes of stimulation in addit
ion to the standard bipolar modes used with the Nucleus 22 device. One
of the indifferent electrodes is a ball placed under the temporalis m
uscle (MP1), whereas the second electrode is mounted on the lateral as
pect of the receiver-stimulator (MP2). After a pre-experimental phase,
subjects used each of three stimulation modes (BP + 1, MP1 and MP2) f
or a total of 4 weeks each. Variables tested with each mode included e
lectric thresholds, comfort levels, dynamic ranges, and speech recogni
tion. Both the MP1 and MP2 modes of stimulation required significantly
less current than the bipolar mode (BP + I)to reach threshold and com
fort level. Analysis of dynamic range data also indicated a significan
t stimulation mode effect. However, stimulation in the various modes d
id not significantly affect speech recognition scores, although two su
bjects demonstrated significantly improved speech recognition scores w
hen programmed in a monopolar mode.