Jr. Geddes et al., WHAT PROPORTION OF PRIMARY PSYCHIATRIC INTERVENTIONS ARE BASED ON EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS, Quality in health care, 5(4), 1996, pp. 215-217
Objectives-To estimate the proportion of psychiatric inpatients receiv
ing primary interventions based on randomised controlled trials or sys
tematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Design-Retrospective
survey. Setting-Acute adult general psychiatric ward. Subjects-All pat
ients admitted to the ward during a 28 day period. Main outcome measur
es-Primary interventions were classified according to whether or not t
hey were supported by evidence from randomised controlled trials or sy
stematic reviews. Results-The primary interventions received by 26/40
(65%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 51% to 79%) of patients admitte
d during the period were based on randomised trials or systematic revi
ews. Conclusions-When patients were used as the denominator, most prim
ary interventions given in acute general psychiatry were based on expe
rimental evidence. The evidence was difficult to locate; there is an u
rgent need for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials in t
his area.