Jw. Matthews et al., REAL-TIME 3D DOSE CALCULATION AND DISPLAY - A TOOL FOR PLAN OPTIMIZATION, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 36(1), 1996, pp. 159-165
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Both human and computer optimization of treatment plans have
advantages; humans are much better at global pattern recognition, and
computers are much better at detailed calculations. A major impediment
to human optimization of treatment plans by manipulation of beam para
meters is the long time required for feedback to the operator on the e
ffectiveness of a change in beam parameters. Our goal was to create a
real-time dose calculation and display system that provides the planne
r with immediate (fraction of a second) feedback with displays of thre
e-dimensional (3D) isodose surfaces, digitally reconstructed radiograp
hs (DRRs), dose-volume histograms, and/or a figure of merit (FOM) (i.e
., a single value plan score function). This will allow the experience
d treatment planner to optimize a plan by adjusting beam parameters ba
sed on a direct indication of plan effectiveness, the FOM value, and t
o use 3D display of target, critical organs, DRRs, and isodose contour
s to guide changes aimed at improving the FOM value. Methods and Mater
ials: We use computer platforms that contain easily utilized parallel
processors and very tight coupling between calculation and display. We
ported code running on a network of two workstations and an array of
transputers to a single multiprocessor workstation. Our current high-p
erformance graphics workstation contains four 150-MHz processors that
can be readily used in a shared-memory multithreaded calculation. Resu
lts: When a 10 x 10-cm beam is moved, using an 8-mm dose grid, the ful
l 3D dose matrix is recalculated using a Bentley-Milan-type dose calcu
lation algorithm, and the 3D dose surface display is then updated, all
in < 0.1 s. A 64 x 64-pixel DRR calculation can be performed in < 0.1
s. Other features, such as automated aperture calculation, are still
required to make real-time feedback practical for clinical use. Conclu
sion: We demonstrate that real-time plan optimization using general pu
rpose multiprocessor workstations is a practical goal. Parallel proces
sing technology provides this capability for 3D planning systems, and
when combined with objective plan ranking algorithms should prove effe
ctive for optimizing 3D conformal radiation therapy. Compared to our e
arlier transputer work, multiprocessor workstations are more easily pr
ogrammed, making software development costs more reasonable compared w
ith uniprocessor development costs. How the dose calculation is partit
ioned into parallel tasks on a multiprocessor work station can make a
significant difference in performance. Shared-memory multiprocessor wo
rkstations are our first choice for future work, because they require
minimum programming effort and continue to be driven to higher perform
ance by competition in the workstation arena.