K. Hittmair et al., SPINAL-CORD LESIONS IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - COMPARISON OF MR PULSE SEQUENCES, American journal of neuroradiology, 17(8), 1996, pp. 1555-1565
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
PURPOSE: To compare T2-weighted conventional spin-echo (CSE), fast spi
n-echo (FSE), short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) FSE, and fluid-atten
uated inversion recovery (FLAIR) FSE sequences in the assessment of ce
rvical multiple sclerosis plaques. METHODS: Twenty patients with clini
cally confirmed multiple sclerosis and signs of cervical cord involvem
ent were examined on a 1.5-7 MR system, Sagittal images of T2-weighted
and proton density-weighted CSE sequences, T2-weighted FSE sequences
with two different sets of sequence parameters, STIR-FSE sequences, an
d FLAIR-FSE sequences were compared by two independent observers. In a
ddition, contrast to-noise measurements were obtained. RESULTS: Spinal
multiple sclerosis plaques were seen best on STIR-FSE images, which y
ielded the highest lesion contrast. Among the T2-weighted sequences, t
he FSE technique provided better image quality than did the CSE techni
que, but lesion visibility was improved only with a repetition time/ec
ho time of 2500/90; parameters of 3000/150 provided poor lesion contra
st but the best myelographic effect and overall image quality. CSE ima
ges were degraded by prominent image noise; FLAIR-FSE: images showed p
oor lesion contrast and strong cerebrospinal fluid pulsation artifacts
. CONCLUSIONS: The STIR-FSE sequence is the best choice for assessment
of spinal multiple sclerosis plaques. For T2-weighted FSE sequences,
shorter echo times are advantageous for spinal cord imaging, long echo
times are superior for extramedullary and extradural disease. FLAIR-F
SE sequences do not contribute much to spinal imaging for multiple scl
erosis detection.