Crop simulation models can be divided into two groups: those that aspi
re to improve our understanding of the physiology and environmental in
teractions of crops (science), and those that aspire to provide sound
management advice to farmers of sound predictions to policy makers (en
gineering). These quite different aspirations require quite different
models. Scientific models rue mechanistic. With a few exceptions, they
have failed to meet their aspirations, They are typically flawed by b
eing based on untestable guesses about the processes that control grow
th. They may, however, provide useful self-education for their develop
ers. The best engineering models me based on robust empirical relation
s between plant behavior and the main environmental variables. Because
of their empirical nature, we should not expect them to apply outside
the range of the environmental variables used in their calibration. W
ithin their calibrated ranges, however, some have proved useful in pro
viding sound management advice. It is hard to see a useful role, other
than self-education, for models that Tan between the scientific and t
he engineering types.