Multiattribute judgement processes have regularly been investigated by
means of structural modelling techniques. With these techniques mathe
matical models are fitted on the data and attribute weights reflecting
the relative importance of the attributes during the process can be d
erived. Since many observations are needed for fitting such models, su
bjects are mostly requested to judge a large number of alternatives. I
n this article it is demonstrated how in situations in which the subje
ct has to select the most attractive alternative out of a set, the dec
ision process can also be studied by fitting a mathematical model, The
validity of the estimates of the attribute weights provided by this m
ethod are investigated in an empirical and a simulation study, It appe
ars that this method gives valuable information about the process, but
that the estimates of the weights are slightly biased.