An alternative theoretical explanation of integration of prior outcome
s in risky decisions is the loss-sensitivity principle stating that a
prior outcome is only added to expected losses. An experiment is repor
ted which tested the implication of this principle that there will be
less integration with an expected loss when its salience is reduced. A
group of 20 undergraduates rated how likely they were to make imagina
ry roulette bets with less salient expected losses whereas another gro
up with an equal number of undergraduates performed the same type of r
atings for imaginary horse-race bets with more salient expected losses
. In support of the implication, a prior outcome had a stronger impact
in the latter group. A stronger impact was furthermore found for high
as compared to low stakes. When the loss was salient, the impact of t
he prior outcome was greater for subjects who reported that they were
in a positive mood than for subjects who reported that they were in a
more neutral mood.