PROCEDURAL DEPENDENCE IN ACTION MEMORY - EFFECTS OF VERB FORM AND INDIVIDUAL VS GROUP CONDITIONS

Citation
T. Helstrup et B. Molander, PROCEDURAL DEPENDENCE IN ACTION MEMORY - EFFECTS OF VERB FORM AND INDIVIDUAL VS GROUP CONDITIONS, Scandinavian journal of psychology, 37(3), 1996, pp. 329-337
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology
ISSN journal
00365564
Volume
37
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
329 - 337
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-5564(1996)37:3<329:PDIAM->2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Two experiments explored whether the magnitude of the enactment effect in action memory (i.e., higher recall with motor than with non-motor encoding) may depend upon the use of individual or group testing proce dures. Nonmotor encoding instructions, requiring the subjects to liste n to orally presented action items, were compared to instructions whic h also required enactment. With encoding treated as a within-subject f actor, the observations failed to reveal any significant difference be tween individual and group testing. With encoding treated as a between -subject factor, the results showed an interaction between test and en coding conditions, such that an enactment effect was found only with g roup testing. Different support value for auditory cues in group and i ndividual test situations was assumed to account for this difference. In a third experiment the indicative and imperative verb forms were co mpared. An interaction was observed, showing that in Norwegian, enacte d verbs were remembered better when presented in the indicative than i n the imperative. No corresponding difference was found under non-enac tment conditions. For this finding, a social interaction interpretatio n was offered.