T. Helstrup et B. Molander, PROCEDURAL DEPENDENCE IN ACTION MEMORY - EFFECTS OF VERB FORM AND INDIVIDUAL VS GROUP CONDITIONS, Scandinavian journal of psychology, 37(3), 1996, pp. 329-337
Two experiments explored whether the magnitude of the enactment effect
in action memory (i.e., higher recall with motor than with non-motor
encoding) may depend upon the use of individual or group testing proce
dures. Nonmotor encoding instructions, requiring the subjects to liste
n to orally presented action items, were compared to instructions whic
h also required enactment. With encoding treated as a within-subject f
actor, the observations failed to reveal any significant difference be
tween individual and group testing. With encoding treated as a between
-subject factor, the results showed an interaction between test and en
coding conditions, such that an enactment effect was found only with g
roup testing. Different support value for auditory cues in group and i
ndividual test situations was assumed to account for this difference.
In a third experiment the indicative and imperative verb forms were co
mpared. An interaction was observed, showing that in Norwegian, enacte
d verbs were remembered better when presented in the indicative than i
n the imperative. No corresponding difference was found under non-enac
tment conditions. For this finding, a social interaction interpretatio
n was offered.