We use a dynamic Tiebout model to analyze the consequences of moving f
rom a pure local system of education finance to a pure state system of
finance in which each student receives the same resources. While much
of the education finance literature focuses on the static or immediat
e effects of such a change, our analysis also examines the dynamic eff
ects. Numerical simulations for a calibrated version of our model indi
cate that these dynamic effects are very important. Comparing steady s
tates, we find that aggregate welfare increases on the order of 10 per
cent following the switch to a state system. The key to this welfare g
ain is that a local system yields inefficiently low investment in huma
n capital of children from low-income families.