CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INTERACTION OF CRYPTOPHYCIN-1 WITH TUBULIN - BINDING IN THE VINCA DOMAIN, COMPETITIVE-INHIBITION OF DOLASTATIN-10 BINDING, AND AN UNUSUAL AGGREGATION REACTION
Rl. Bai et al., CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INTERACTION OF CRYPTOPHYCIN-1 WITH TUBULIN - BINDING IN THE VINCA DOMAIN, COMPETITIVE-INHIBITION OF DOLASTATIN-10 BINDING, AND AN UNUSUAL AGGREGATION REACTION, Cancer research, 56(19), 1996, pp. 4398-4406
The antimitotic depsipeptide cryptophgcin 1 (CP1) was compared to the
antimitotic peptide dolastatin 10 (D10) as an antiproliferative agent
and in its interactions with purified tubulin. The potent activity of
CP1 as an inhibitor of cell growth was confirmed. The agent had an IC5
0 of 20 pM against L1210 murine leukemia cells versus 0.5 nM for D10.
Both drugs were comparable as inhibitors of the glutamate-induced asse
mbly of purified tubulin, with D10 being slightly more potent. CP1, li
ke D10, was a noncompetitive inhibitor of the binding of [H-3]vinblast
ine to tubulin (apparent K-i, 3.9 mu M); and the depsipeptide was a co
mpetitive inhibitor of the binding of [H-3]D10 to tubulin (apparent K-
i, 2.1 mu M). CP1 was less potent than D10 as an inhibitor of nucleoti
de exchange on tubulin, but the two drugs were equivalent in stabilizi
ng the colchicine binding activity of tubulin, CP1, like D10, caused t
he formation of extensive structured aggregates of tubulin when presen
t in stoichiometric amounts relative to the protein. Whereas at lower
concentrations the drugs were equivalent in causing formation of small
oligomers detected by gel permeation highperformance liquid chromatog
raphy, there were notable differences in the aggregation reactions ind
uced by the two drugs. The electron micrographic appearance of the D10
-induced aggregate differed substantially from that of the CP1 induced
aggregate. With D10, but not CP1, aggregate morphology was greatly al
tered in the presence of microtubule-associated proteins. Finally, alt
hough CP1 caused the formation of massive aggregates, as did D10, ther
e was little turbidity change with the depsipeptide as opposed to the
peptide.