R. Crouch et al., ANALYSIS OF TELEPHONE CALLS TO AN INNER-CITY ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 89(6), 1996, pp. 324-328
The general public in the UK often telephone accident and emergency (A
&E) departments for medical advice. Such calls are usually dealt with
by nursing staff in an informal manner (often with no written record o
f the call being made). The specific questions addressed in this study
are who was calling for advice, when did they call, what were their p
resenting complaints, and what was the outcome of the call? In additio
n, the study provided an opportunity to test the implementation of a n
ew system of record-keeping for telephone consultation. A telephone co
nsultation record (TCR) was developed and used to record details of ea
ch call made to the A&E department for medical/health advice. An analy
sis of 597 consecutive documented calls is presented in this paper. Th
e majority of calls were dealt with by 'E' grade nursing staff (42.7%)
; only four calls (0.7%) were recorded by medical staff. Two hundred a
nd six (43.5%) calls related to patients aged up to 15 years. In 57% o
f the cases the call was made by a third party. In all, 149 different
presenting complaints were recorded on the TCRs. The three most common
presenting complaints were dental problems (7.4%), fever (4.3%), and
concerns about drug reactions (23%). Seventy-three per cent of callers
were advised that a visit to the A&E department was not immediately n
ecessary. The study identifies several important issues for developmen
t of a more formal and effective system of telephone advice. The major
ity of calls made to the A&E department appeared to be of a primary ca
re nature but the extent to which nurses are trained to assess and adv
ise on these problems needs to be questioned. A reluctance to document
the calls to A&E was identified, one reason being a concern about acc
ountability. Training and support are clearly required.