STRONG CLUSTERING OF FAINT GALAXIES AT SMALL ANGULAR SCALES

Citation
L. Infante et al., STRONG CLUSTERING OF FAINT GALAXIES AT SMALL ANGULAR SCALES, The Astrophysical journal, 469(2), 1996, pp. 85-88
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Journal title
ISSN journal
0004637X
Volume
469
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Part
2
Pages
85 - 88
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-637X(1996)469:2<85:SCOFGA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The two-point angular correlation function of galaxies, omega(theta), has been computed on equatorial fields observed with the Cerro Telolo Inter-American Observatory 4 m prime focus, within a total area of 2,3 1 deg(2). In the magnitude range 19 less than or equal to m(R) less th an or equal to 21.5, corresponding to (z) approximate to 0.35, we find an excess of power in omega(theta) at scales 2 '' less than or equal to theta less than or equal to 6 '' over what would be expected from a n extrapolation of omega(theta) measured at larger theta. The signific ance of this excess is approximate to 5 sigma. At larger scales, 6 '' < theta less than or equal to 24 '' the amplitude of omega(theta) is 1 .6 times smaller than the standard nonevolutionary model. At these sca les there is remarkable agreement between the present data and Infante & Pritchet (1995). At large angular scales (6 '' < theta less than or equal to 24 '') the data are best described by a model where clusteri ng evolution in xi(r, z) has taken place. Strong luminosity evolution cannot be ruled out with the present data. At smaller scales, 2 '' les s than or equal to theta less than or equal to 6 '', our data are form ally fitted by models where epsilon = -2.4(Omega = 0.2, r(0) = 5.1 h(- 1) Mpc) or r(0) 7.3 h(-1) Mpc (Omega = 0.2, epsilon = 0). If the mean redshift of our sample is 0.35, then our data show a clear detection o f the scale (approximate to 19 h(-1) kpc) where the clustering evoluti on approaches a highly nonlinear regime, i.e., epsilon less than or eq ual to 0. The rate at which galaxies merge has been computed. If this rate is proportional to (1 + z)(m), then m = 2.2 +/- 0.5.