ATENOLOL AND NIFEDIPINE VERSUS NITRENDIPI NE - COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND TOLERANCE AMONG PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION BY 24-HOUR BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING
G. Voncossel et al., ATENOLOL AND NIFEDIPINE VERSUS NITRENDIPI NE - COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND TOLERANCE AMONG PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION BY 24-HOUR BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING, Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, 25(8), 1996, pp. 379-381
The aim of the presented multicentric, double-blind randomized study w
as to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a fixed combination of ate
nolol 50 mg and nifedipine 20 mg in a slow-release form versus nitrend
ipine 20 mg on patients with mild-to-moderate arterial hypertension. A
2-week single-blind placebo phase was followed by a 4-week verum phas
e in which the patients were given either atenolol and nifedipine or n
itrendipine alone. The efficacy of the respective medication was measu
red by accidental blood pressure taking or by 24-hour automated blood
pressure monitoring before and after therapy. Eighty-six patients were
included in the study, 78 patients finally entered the randomized ver
um phase. For the combination of atenolol and nifedipine a significant
ly higher reduction in blood pressure than in the nitrendipine group w
as observed. The reduction was 17.2 mmHg vs. 8.2 mmHg in the systolic
24-hour average value and 11.7 vs. 4.7 mmHg in the diastolic 24-hour v
alue, respectively. In addition to that the duration of action was mar
kedly longer for atenolol/nifedipine. The tolerance for the combinatio
n medication was better than for nitrendipine, 2 vs. 6 patients from t
he nitrendipine group had to be excluded from the study due to serious
side effects. Because of these results a combination therapy of ateno
lol and nifedipine should be given preference over a therapy with nitr
endipine alone in patients with mild-to moderate hypertension.