COMBINED USE OF 3 TECHNIQUES FOR STUDYING TRANSPORT AND DISPERSION INCUMULI

Citation
J. Stith et al., COMBINED USE OF 3 TECHNIQUES FOR STUDYING TRANSPORT AND DISPERSION INCUMULI, Journal of applied meteorology, 35(9), 1996, pp. 1387-1401
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN journal
08948763
Volume
35
Issue
9
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1387 - 1401
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-8763(1996)35:9<1387:CUO3TF>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The results from three methods for studying transport and dispersion i n cumuli are compared. These three methods include two tracer techniqu es and a numerical simulation. The tracers, SF6 and radar chaff, were simultaneously released below the base of a convective storm. The SF6 was measured in situ by two research. aircraft and the chaff was follo wed using TRACIR (tracking air with circular-polarized radar), a metho d that measures the circular depolarization ratio (CDR) of the chaff, which is much stronger than that of most hydrometeors. TRACIR allows t he CDR signal from the chaff to be measured and traced even when the r eflectivity from the chaff is much less than that from the cloud. The behavior of the two-tracer release was compared with the trajectories of air from a two-dimensional simulation of the storm, using a nonhydr ostatic cloud model, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration /Goddard Cumulus Ensemble Model. By combining information hom the thre e techniques, their individual shortcomings are alleviated, and a more complete documentation of transport and dispersion is provided. The t racers were followed during a 32-min period as they were transported 6 km vertically by the storm at an average rate of 2.6 m s(-1). This wa s within the ranges of the vertical transport rate of trajectories in the model simulation. The maximum updraft speed measured by the aircra ft was 18 m s(-1), which agreed well with the maximum updraft in the s imulations of 20 m s(-1). Both the simulation and the chaff observatio ns show that portions of the released material were incorporated into the cloud and other portions were not. The main area of downward trans port was located in the lower third of the simulated cloud where the r ainfall was the heaviest. Major downdrafts were not found in the upper regions of the storm where the aircraft were sampling. The simulation suggests that the precipitation;induced downdraft played the major ro le in determining the trajectories of air from the cloud base, at leas t at the mature stage of the storm. Interactions between cloud-base ai r and downdrafts took place in the lower third of the storm where the bulk of the precipitation was located.