Background We recently reported that some patients with heart failure
and exercise intolerance exhibit severe hemodynamic dysfunction during
exercise, whereas others have normal cardiac output responses to exer
cise. We postulated that, patients with preserved cardiac output respo
nses to exercise are limited by deconditioning and would respond to ex
ercise training: whereas patients with reduced cardiac output response
s are limited by skeletal muscle underperfusion and would not improve
with exercise training. The present study was undertaken to test this
hypothesis. Methods and Results Thirty-two patients with heart failure
were studied. Hemodynamic response to maximal treadmill exercise was
measured; then patients were enrolled in a standard 3-month cardiac re
habilitation program. Peak exercise VO2, lactate threshold, and qualit
y-of-life questionnaires were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 months. Twenty-o
ne patients had normal cardiac output responses to exercise. All 21 pa
tients participated in the rehabilitation program without difficulty,
and 9 (43%) responded to rehabilitation, defined as a >10% increase in
both peak exercise VO2 and the anaerobic threshold. Of the 11 patient
s with reduced cardiac output responses to exercise, 3 discontinued re
habilitation because of severe exhaustion, and only 1 qualified as a r
esponder (9%; P<.04 versus preserved cardiac output). Conclusions Pati
ents with heart failure and normal cardiac output responses to exercis
e frequently improve with exercise training. Patients with severe hemo
dynamic dysfunction during exercise usually do not improve with traini
ng, which suggests that they are limited primarily by circulatory fact
ors.