EVALUATION OF THE SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS-SYSTEM USING HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY AND PLASMA HORMONES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS TREATED WITH CILAZAPRIL AND ATENOLOL
M. Campelo et al., EVALUATION OF THE SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS-SYSTEM USING HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY AND PLASMA HORMONES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS TREATED WITH CILAZAPRIL AND ATENOLOL, Cardiology, 87(5), 1996, pp. 402-408
In a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel study, we assessed basal
and post-therapeutic sympathetic activity both in supine and standing
positions in mildly to moderately hypertensive patients by two differ
ent methods: frequency domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV)
and plasma levels of both noradrenaline (NA) and its metabolite, 3,4-d
ihydroxyphenylglycol (DOPEG). Patients were evaluated on placebo and a
fter 8 weeks of treatment with either cilazapril, 2.5-5 mg/day (13 pat
ients) or atenolol, 50-100 mg/day (14 patients). Twenty-four-hour bloo
d pressure was similarly reduced (p < 0.01) by both cilazapril and ate
nolol. Heart rate decreased with atenolol by 14 beats per min (p < 0.0
01) but did not change with cilazapril. When compared to the placebo,
cilazapril did not modify sympathetic activity indices of HRV but did
significantly reduce NA and DOPEG levels in both the supine and standi
ng (p < 0.05) positions. As expected, atenolol reduced (p < 0.05) symp
athetic activity indices of HRV but did not modify NA levels in either
position. Moreover, while on placebo, patients showed no significant
correlations between values of NA or DOPEG, nor in any of the HRV indi
ces. We conclude that: (1) the antihypertensive effects of cilazapril
and atenolol are similar, but in these patients, sympathetic activity
indices showed divergent results both before and after therapy; (2) th
is may be due to different aspects of sympathetic activators, assessed
independently by different methods, and (3) these discrepancies must
be taken into account when evaluating autonomous nervous system parame
ters.