OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and cost-effectiveness of cryopr
eserved homograft cardiac valves prepared on site to valves prepared c
ommercially. DESIGN: A review of all patients who received homograft h
eart valves between January 1990 and December 1993, with cost-effectiv
eness analysis. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 37 months (mean 12 months).
SETTING: Tertiary-care adult and pediatric hospitals. PATIENTS: All c
onsecutive patients receiving homograft heart valves in either the aor
tic or right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) position since on-site p
reparation of cryopreserved cardiac valves began in 1990. Forty-three
patients received 47 homograft valve replacements: 18 in the aortic po
sition and 29 in the RVOT position. No patients were lost to follow-up
. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Valve function as assessed by patient surviva
l, actuarial freedom from reoperation and Doppler echocardiographic as
sessment of transvalvar gradients and valvar insufficiency. Cost-effec
tiveness as assessed by a formal evaluation of on-site costs compared
with current prices for commercially prepared valves. RESULTS: There w
ere four operative deaths but no late deaths. Four valves were removed
. Freedom from reoperation at 3 years was 100% for aortic valve replac
ement and 85% for RVOT reconstruction. Echocardiographic follow-up of
34 of the remaining 39 patients showed mild or no insufficiency in 24
valves, moderate insufficiency in 8 valves and severe, but not clinica
lly significant, insufficiency in 2 valves. The cost of on-site prepar
ation of the valves was $1363 compared with $5040 for the commercially
prepared valves, a cost saving for the group of $172 819. CONCLUSIONS
: On-site preparation is an effective method of preparing cryopreserve
d cardiac valves and permits significant-cost savings.