S. Killcross et B. Balleine, ROLE OF PRIMARY MOTIVATION IN STIMULUS PREEXPOSURE EFFECTS, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes, 22(1), 1996, pp. 32-42
It is currently a matter of debate whether the deficit in conditioning
observed after stimulus preexposure is one of acquisition or one of p
erformance. The major criticism of performance-based theories is their
inability to specify what is learned during nonreinforced preexposure
that may influence subsequent acquisition of conditioned responding.
Experiments 1 and 2 used an excitatory appetitive conditioning procedu
re and Experiment 3 used an inhibitory appetitive conditioning procedu
re, with rats as subjects, and consistently found that the effects of
preexposure to a stimulus transferred to conditioning only when the re
inforcer was relevant to the motivational state in which that preexpos
ure was conducted. This finding suggests that during preexposure, rats
learn that a stimulus is unrelated to events of relevance to their cu
rrent motivational state.