U. Troger et al., STUDY ON THE BIOEQUIVALENCE OF AN ORAL NIFEDIPINE FORMULATION AND A SUSTAINED-RELEASE REFERENCE PREPARATION AFTER SINGLE-DOSE AND REPEATED DOSES, Arzneimittel-Forschung, 45-2(12), 1995, pp. 1266-1270
Pharmacokinetic parameters of an oral formulation of nifedipine (CAS 2
1829-25-4, Corinfar(R), test preparation To a dragee with 10 mg nifedi
pine) were compared with a reference preparation (fi a sustained relea
se tablet with 20 mg nifedipine) in 16 healthy volunteers in a open tw
o-way crossover study under the influence of ingestion of food A GC/MS
method was used to analyse the serum samples. The estimation of bioeq
uivalence was based on a nonparametric statistical procedure of analys
is of variance. Both, the test preparation T and the reference prepara
tion R are bioequivalent at steady state. The main pharmacokinetic par
ameters (mean +/- standard deviation) used for the bioequivalence deci
sion at steady state AUC(O-tau)(SS) (T: 351.4 +/- 161.0 ng . ml(-1). h
, R: 345.5 +/- 146.8 ng . ml(-1). h), C-max(SS) (T: 67.3 +/- 29.5 ng .
ml(-1); 66.9 +/- 33.0 ng . ml(-1)) and HVDSS (T: 3.8 +/- 1.3 h; R: 4.
2 +/- 1.8 h). The bioequivalence of rate and extent of absorption was
proved for both preparations at steady state by assessing mean serum l
evel curves as well as by statistics (90% confidence intervals) using
the main pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-tau)(SS) (range: 0.84-1.02 p
oint estimator 0.92), C-max(SS) (0.95-1.33, 1.15) HVDSS (0.72-0.98; 0.
82). The large interindividual variability of pharmacokinetics is typi
cal of the drug and does not depend on the formulation used. No case o
f severe disturbance of circulatory function or other adverse events w
ith the duty to treat occurred during the study. No volunteer dropped
out.