VELOCITY PROFILES AND SURFACE-ROUGHNESS UNDER BREAKING WAVES

Authors
Citation
Pd. Craig, VELOCITY PROFILES AND SURFACE-ROUGHNESS UNDER BREAKING WAVES, J GEO RES-O, 101(C1), 1996, pp. 1265-1277
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Oceanografhy
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
ISSN journal
21699275 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
C1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1265 - 1277
Database
ISI
SICI code
2169-9275(1996)101:C1<1265:VPASUB>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Recent measurements under wave-breaking conditions in the ocean lakes, and tanks reveal a layer immediately below the surface in which dissi pation decays as depth to the power -2 to -4 and downwind velocities a re approximately linear with depth. This behavior is consistent with p redictions of a conventional, one-dimensional, level 2.5 turbulence cl osure model, in which the influence of breaking waves is parameterized as a surface source of turbulent kinetic energy. The model provides a n analytic solution which describes the near-surface power law behavio r and the deeper transition to the ''law of the wall.'' The mixing len gth imposed in the model increases linearly away from a minimum value, the roughness length,at the surface. The surface roughness emerges as an important scaling factor in the wave-enhanced layer but is the maj or unknown in the formulation. Measurements in the wave-affected layer are still rare, but one exceptional set, both in terms of its accurac y and proximity to the surface, is that collected by Cheung and Street [1988] in the Stanford wind tunnel. Their velocity profiles, first, c onfirm the accuracy of the model and, second, allow estimation, via a best fit procedure, of roughness lengths at five different wind speeds . Conclusions are tentative but indicate that the roughness length inc reases with wind speed and appears to take a value of approximately on e sixth the dominant surface wavelength. A more traditional wall-layer model, which ignores the flux of turbulent kinetic energy, will also accurately reproduce the measured velocity profiles. In this case, enh anced surface turbulence is forced on the model by the assumption of a large surface roughness, three times that required by the full model. However, the wall-layer model cannot predict the enhanced dissipation near the surface.