Dps. Obrart et al., EFFECTS OF ABLATION DIAMETER, DEPTH, AND EDGE CONTOUR ON THE OUTCOME OF PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY, Journal of refractive surgery, 12(1), 1996, pp. 50-60
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the ablation diameter, depth, a
nd edge contour on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive kerate
ctomy (PRK). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in which 60 pa
tients (60 eyes) were randomly allocated to 5.00-mm, 6.00-mm, or 5.00
to 6.00-mm multizone treatment groups. All eyes underwent a -6.00 diop
ter (D) correction using a Summit Omnimed excimer laser. RESULTS: In e
yes treated with 6.00-mm diameter zones, the initial hyperopic shift w
as reduced, with significant differences at 1 and 4 weeks (p<0.01). At
6 and 12 months, the refractive changes were closer to the intended c
orrection with 6.00-mm diameters. The predictability of PRK was improv
ed with 6.00-mm zones, with a significant reduction in variance of the
refractive changes, at all stages postoperatively (p<0.05 to p<0.001)
. Objective measurements of haze were significantly less at 1, 3, and
6 months with 6.00-mm ablations (p<0.05). There were no differences be
tween the 5.00-mm and the 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone groups. Computeri
zed measurements of ''night'' halo were significantly smaller in the 6
.00-mm treatment group at 1 week and 1 month (p<0.05). At 12 months, t
wo patients treated with 5.00-mm zones and three with the 5.00- to 6.0
0-mm multizone complained of severe night vision disturbances. No 6.00
-mm eyes were similarly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a 6.00-m
m spherical ablation diameter produced less initial overcorrection, im
proved predictability, and was associated with a reduction in postoper
ative halos and night vision disturbances. Creating a superficial blen
d zone with a 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone treatment had no beneficial e
ffect on the outcome.