THE NOVEL STRUCTURE OF THE [AU-11(PMEPH(2))(10)](3- CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES OF [AU-11(PMEPH2)(10)] [C2B9H12](3)CENTER-DOT-4THF AND [AU-11(PMEPH(2))(10)] [C2B9H12](3) (THF=TETRAHYDROFURAN)() CATION )
Rcb. Copley et Mp. Mingos, THE NOVEL STRUCTURE OF THE [AU-11(PMEPH(2))(10)](3- CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES OF [AU-11(PMEPH2)(10)] [C2B9H12](3)CENTER-DOT-4THF AND [AU-11(PMEPH(2))(10)] [C2B9H12](3) (THF=TETRAHYDROFURAN)() CATION ), Journal of the Chemical Society. Dalton transactions, (4), 1996, pp. 479-489
Crystal structure analyses of [Au-11(PMePh(2))(10)][C2B9H12](3) . 4thf
(thf = tetrahydrofuran) and [Au-11(PMePh(2))(10)][C2B9H12](3) showed
the metal framework of the [Au-11(PMePh(2))(10)](3+) cation to approxi
mate to a centred bicapped square antiprism, with idealized D-4d symme
try. Symmetry-related cage distances and angles have similar mean valu
es but different ranges in the two structures, with the latter having
greater consistency in the peripheral bond lengths but more distortion
in the squares of the antiprism. It is suggested that these differenc
es are directly related to the ligand packing around the metal skeleto
ns. The cations of the two clusters cannot be superimposed in any orie
ntation. It is possible to relate a centred bicapped square antiprism
to the previously reported undecagold cage geometry, although they bel
ong to different symmetry point groups. The largest differences betwee
n the idealized C-3v and D-4d frameworks centre around three adjacent
peripheral sites. The movements required to interconvert the geometrie
s take place about a common mirror plane and appear to be closely rela
ted to those of the diamond-square-diamond rearrangement mechanism. Fl
uxional interconversions of this type provide a possible explanation f
or the P-31-{H-1} NMR spectra of the Au-11 cluster compounds.