T. Yamada et al., TOPOGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS FOLLOWING STIMULATION OF TIBIAL, SURAL AND LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVES, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Evoked potentials, 100(1), 1996, pp. 33-43
Using topographic maps, we studied the scalp field distribution of som
atosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in response to the stimulation of
the tibial (TN), sural (SN) and lateral femoral cutaneous (LFCN) nerve
s in 24 normal volunteers. Cortical peaks, i.e., N35, P40, N50 and P60
were generally dominant in the contralateral hemisphere for the LFCN-
SEP, whereas all peaks except N35 had dominance in the ipsilateral hem
isphere for TN- and SN-SEPs. The findings imply that ipsilateral or co
ntralateral peak dominance for the lower extremity SEP is determined b
y where the cortical leg representation occurs. As a result, mesial he
misphere representation results in peak dominance projected to the hem
isphere ipsilateral to stimulation. Representations at the superior li
p of the interhemispheric fissure or lateral convexity lead to midline
or contralateral peak dominance. These findings also suggest that the
paradoxically lateralized P40 is not the result of a positive field d
ipole shadow generated by the primary negative wave in the mesial hemi
sphere, but is the primary positive wave, analogous to P26 of the medi
an nerve SEP. Accordingly, contralaterally dominant N35 is likely equi
valent to the first cortical potential of N20 in the median nerve SEP.
The difference in vector directions of potential fields between N35 a
nd P40 may account for the opposite hemispheric dominance for these pe
aks in TN- and SN-SEPs.