ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN MULTIPLE-MYELOMA - A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-MATCHED STUDYFROM THE EUROPEAN GROUP FOR BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
B. Bjorkstrand et al., ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN MULTIPLE-MYELOMA - A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-MATCHED STUDYFROM THE EUROPEAN GROUP FOR BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, Blood, 88(12), 1996, pp. 4711-4718
A retrospective case-matched analysis was performed comparing 189 myel
oma patients treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo
-BMT) with an equal number of patients who received autologous stem ce
ll transplantation (ASCT). Matching was performed with respect to gend
er and number of treatment lines before transplantation. The groups we
re comparable with the exception of median age (43 years for allo-BMT
v 49 years for ASCT, P = .0001) and median posttransplant follow-up (4
6 months for allo-BMT v 30 months for ASCT, P = .0003). The overall su
rvival was significantly better for ASCT than for allo-BMT, with a med
ian survival of 34 months and 18 months, respectively (P = .001). Howe
ver, this survival advantage was only observed in men, but not in wome
n. The statistically significant survival advantage for ASCT was seen
in most subgroups, ie, chemotherapy-responsive patients, patients who
had received two or more treatment lines before transplantation, patie
nts in partial remission, patients with an IgG-subtype, patients older
than 46 years of age, patients with stage II disease, and patients wi
th a low or high serum-beta-2-microglobulin at diagnosis. The main rea
son for the poorer survival in allo-BMT patients was higher transplant
-related mortality (41% v 13% for ASCT, P = .0001), which was not comp
ensated for by a lower rate of relapse and progression. However, in pa
tients alive at 1 year posttransplant, there was a trend for better lo
ng-term survival (P = .09) and significantly better progression-free s
urvival (P = .02) for allo-BMT as compared with ASCT. We conclude that
the median survival is superior for ASCT. However, allo-BMT has a low
er relapse rate, which results in a similar long-term outcome for both
approaches, but a longer follow-up is needed to assess the final outc
ome. (C) 1996 by The American Society of Hematology.