R. Somoza et al., PALEOMAGNETISM OF UPPER MIOCENE IGNIMBRITES AT THE PUNA - AN ANALYSISOF VERTICAL-AXIS ROTATIONS IN THE CENTRAL ANDES, J GEO R-SOL, 101(B5), 1996, pp. 11387-11400
The origin of the rotations detected paleomagnetically in the Central
Andes is controversial. Tectonic models proposed to explain it involve
Late Cenozoic oroclinal bending (the Bolivian Orocline), and/or small
-block rotations driven by oblique subduction. In this paper, we repor
t paleomagnetic data from upper Miocene ignimbrites from the Puna, in
the presumed southern limb of the orocline. These rocks showed high un
blocking temperature and high coercivity magnetization. The resulting
pole position (latitude 85.7 degrees S, longitude 80.5 degrees E, A(95
)=7.9 degrees, K=22, N=17) indicates that the study area has not been
significantly affected by vertical-axis rotation since late Miocene on
ward. This implies that the whole Puna has not undergone significant r
egional rigid-body rotation during the same time span. A farther analy
sis based on Neogene paleomagnetic data from 31 Andean localities dist
ributed from 11 degrees S to 31 degrees S shows the presence of rotate
d and unrotated areas. Systematic counterclockwise rotations in Peru a
nd northern Bolivia are observed, whereas clockwise rotations are pres
ent in southern Bolivia, northern Chile, and perhaps northwestern Arge
ntina. No systematic rotations are found farther south. The overall ti
me-spatial distributions of these Neogene paleomagnetic data suggest t
hat if orogenic bending occurred, it must have taken place before the
middle Miocene. Thus the oroclinal hypothesis can not explain the rota
tions observed in middle Miocene rocks or younger ones, which also sho
w orocline-like declination anomalies. We suggest that small-block rot
ations driven by distributed shear may be a single process that can ac
count for the whole rotations in the Central Andes. It is hypothesized
that horizontal shear in the Andean crust could be controlled by anci
ent structures.