LIPOIC ACID (THIOCTIC ACID) ANALOGS, TRYPTOPHAN ANALOGS, AND UREA DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ASSAY OF BIOTIN AND BIOTIN METABOLITES BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY AVIDIN-BINDING ASSAY
J. Zempleni et al., LIPOIC ACID (THIOCTIC ACID) ANALOGS, TRYPTOPHAN ANALOGS, AND UREA DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ASSAY OF BIOTIN AND BIOTIN METABOLITES BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY AVIDIN-BINDING ASSAY, Journal of nutritional biochemistry, 7(9), 1996, pp. 518-523
Lipoic acid, urea, and tryptophan show structural similarities to the
vitamin biotin. If these compounds can successfully compete with bioti
n or a biotinylated protein for binding to avidin, their presence in s
erum and urine would cause artifacts in avidin-binding assays for biot
in. We assessed the ability of lipoic acid and certain analogs, urea,
and L-tryptophan and tryptophan derivatives to interfere with the meas
urement of 16 biotin analogs by a high-performance liquid chromatograp
hy (HPLC)/avidin-binding assay. In this assay, compounds are separated
by reversed-phase HPLC, followed by assay of each fraction based on b
inding to avidin-horseradish peroxidase. At physiologic concentrations
, neither lipoic acid analogs (d-lipoate, 1-lipoate, d,1-lipoamide, bi
snorlipoate, beta-hydroxybisnorlipoate, and tetranorlipoate) nor trypt
ophan derivatives exhibited detectable avidin-binding. Minor avidin-bi
nding was seen for urea and L-tryptophan; binding ratios relative to b
iotin were 1 x 10(-9) and 3 x 10(-6) respectively. Urea did not co-elu
te on HPLC with any of the 16 biotin analogs bus L-tryptophan did co-e
lute with bisnorbiotin methyl ketone. However, because the relative av
idin affinity of L-tryptophan is five orders of magnitude smaller than
that of bisnorbiotin methyl ketone, we conclude that none of the test
ed compounds are likely to interfere with the measurement of biotin or
its metabolites by an HPLC/avidin-binding assay.