PHASE-I STUDY OF SIMULTANEOUS DOSE-ESCALATION AND SCHEDULE ACCELERATION OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-DOXORUBICIN-ETOPOSIDE USING GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR WITH OR WITHOUT ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
A. Ardizzoni et al., PHASE-I STUDY OF SIMULTANEOUS DOSE-ESCALATION AND SCHEDULE ACCELERATION OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-DOXORUBICIN-ETOPOSIDE USING GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR WITH OR WITHOUT ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER, British Journal of Cancer, 74(7), 1996, pp. 1141-1147
A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an 'a
ccelerated' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased furth
er, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single dr
ug of the regimen. Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung
cancer (SCLC) received escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (C) 1100-1
300 mg m(-2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (D) 50-60 mg m
(-2) i.v. on day 1, etoposide (E) 110-130 mg m(-2) i.v. on days 1, 2,
3 and every 14 days for at least three courses. Along with chemotherap
y, G-CSF (filgastrim) 5 mu g kg(-1) from day 5 to day 11 was administe
red subcutaneously (s.c.) to all patients. Twenty-five patients were e
nrolled into the study. All patients at the first dose level (C 1100,
D 50, E 110 x 3) completed three or more cycles at the dose and schedu
le planned by the protocol and no 'dose-limiting toxicity' (DLT) was s
een. At the second dose level (C 1200, D 55, E 120 x 3) three out of f
ive patients had a DLT consisting of 'granulocytopenic fever' (GCPF).
Another six patients were treated at this dose level with the addition
of ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and only two patients had a DLT [
one episode of documented oral candidiasis and one of 'fever of unknow
n origin' (FUO) with generalised mucositis]. Accrual of patients proce
eded to the third dose level (C 1300, D 60, E 130 x 3) with the prophy
lactic use of ciprofloxacin. Four out of six patients experienced a DL
T consisting of GCPF or documented non-bacterial infection. Accrual of
patients at the third dose level was then resumed adding to ciproflox
acin anti-fungal prophylaxis (fluconazole 100 mg daily) and anti-viral
prophylaxis (acyclovir 800 mg twice a day) from day 5 to 11. Out of f
ive patients treated three experienced a DLT consisting of severe leuc
openia and fever or infection. With a simultaneous dose escalation and
schedule acceleration it is indeed possible to take maximum advantage
of G-CSF activity and to increase CDE dose intensity by a factor 1.65
-1.80 for a maximum of 3-4 courses. The role of antimicrobial prophyla
xis in this setting deserves to be investigated further.