Ie. Brown et al., RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN RANGE OF MOTION, L(0), AND PASSIVE FORCE IN 5 STRAP-LIKE MUSCLES OF THE FELINE HIND-LIMB, Journal of morphology, 230(1), 1996, pp. 69-77
The relationships between range of motion, optimal length for force pr
oduction (l(o)), and passive force provide useful insights into the st
ructure and function of muscles but are unknown for most individual mu
scles. We measured these values and examined their relationships in fi
ve strap-like muscles of the cat hind limb: caudofemoralis, semitendin
osus, sartorius anterior, tenuissimus, and biceps femoris anterior. Th
e range of motion relative to l(o) was found to vary significantly bet
ween different muscles and even between different specimens of the sam
e muscle. The passive force-length (FL) curve was found to be correlat
ed with both l(o) and l(max) (maximal in situ muscle length) but was c
orrelated more strongly with l(max). The mean passive force produced b
y these muscles at l(max) was less than 7% of estimated maximal isomet
ric force, suggesting that passive force may not be important in these
muscles during normal activation patterns. The variance in passive FL
curves between specimens of the same muscle was found to be significa
ntly lower when length was scaled by l(max) as opposed to l(o). These
results suggest that l(max) may provide a more useful scaling factor f
or generic models of muscle. However, the passive length-tension prope
rties of mammalian muscle appear to reflect a complex mix of structure
s at both the myofilament and connective tissue levels that may differ
depending on muscle-fiber architecture and perhaps on the history of
trophic influences on a particular specimen. (C) 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.