OBJECTIVE. We investigated the frequency, manifestations, and severity
of reactions to gadolinium contrast media in patients who underwent M
R imaging at a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed
the quality assurance records of 21,000 patients to whom gadolinium co
ntrast media were administered at our institution between January 1990
and October 1994. Of these patients, 36 had adverse reactions. All 36
patients were evaluated by a radiologist at the time of the adverse r
eaction, and a written report of the findings was completed immediatel
y. RESULTS. We classified adverse reactions into four groups: mild non
allergic reactions (15 patients with nausea or vomiting), mild reactio
ns resembling allergy (12 patients with hives, diffuse erythema, or sk
in irritation), moderate reactions resembling allergy (seven patients
with respiratory symptoms), and life-threatening reactions resembling
allergy (two patients with severe chest tightness, respiratory distres
s, and periorbital edema). Eleven of these 36 patients who had adverse
reactions also had an unusual local reaction of skin discomfort in th
e extremity through which gadolinium was injected. Four of the 36 pati
ents with adverse reactions had histories of adverse reactions to iodi
nated contrast media. All four of these patients and one of the remain
ing 32 patients with adverse reactions required treatment. No patients
with adverse reactions died. CONCLUSION. Although gadolinium contrast
media are safe, we found that patients had adverse reactions at a fre
quency greater than we expected. Severe anaphylactoid reactions occurr
ed in two patients (0.01%). This rate exceeds the rate of 0.0003% repo
rted in the literature. The indexes of suspicion for the occurrence of
reactions to gadolinium, and both the documentation and the managemen
t of adverse reactions, must be as rigorous for reactions associated w
ith MR imaging contrast agents as they are for reactions associated wi
th iodinated contrast media.