ENERGY MAXIMIZATION VS TIME MINIMIZATION IN THE FORAGING OF THE LIMPET PATELLA-VULGATA
Citation
G. Santini et G. Chelazzi, ENERGY MAXIMIZATION VS TIME MINIMIZATION IN THE FORAGING OF THE LIMPET PATELLA-VULGATA, Journal of Animal Ecology, 65(5), 1996, pp. 599-605
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology
SICI code
0021-8790(1996)65:5<599:EMVTMI>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
1. Recent field recording of grazing activity in Patella vulgata has s
hown that limpets maintain an almost continuous grazing rate during th
e whole foraging excursion. Since previous assessment of the foraging
strategy of this species, based on the assumption that grazing rate va
ried between foraging and travelling, led to conclude that this specie
s adopts a time minimization strategy, we tested a new model based on
a constant grazing rate whilst travelling. 2. Two opposite strategies
were tested: (a) maximization of the energy gain (Emax), and (b) minim
ization of the time spent away from the home scar (Tmin). Predictions
based on these two strategies, temporal constraints on foraging activi
ty and on estimates of energy input and costs incurred by limpets, wer
e compared with the behaviour of a population of limpets inhabiting a
vertical wall at Menai Bridge (UK). 3. According to strategy (a) limpe
ts would forage for the entire duration of their potential activity ph
ase (nocturnal low tide), whereas according to strategy (b) they would
only spend away from home the time necessary to balance energy expend
iture, which roughly corresponds to one-quarter of the entire duration
of the potential activity phase. Moreover, according to the energy ma
ximization strategy, duration of grazing would be independent of size,
while according to the time minimization strategy a positive correlat
ion of grazing activity would be expected with size. 4. The comparison
of empirical data with the outputs of the model showed that neither a
pure time minimization nor the energy maximization hypothesis can pro
vide good estimates for the behaviour of the studied population of P.
vulgata, which appears somehow intermediate between the two strategies
. The possible explanations for this result are discussed in relation
to the biology of the species, the assumptions of the model, and the d
ifficulties in estimating the critical parameters.