Background: Showers and tubs in labor were not generally used in our c
enter When three whirlpool baths (Jacuzzis) were ordered as part of ou
r renovations, a randomized, controlled trial was initiated to explore
their effects on narcotic and epidural requirements. Methods: This st
udy employed an intent-to-treat design, and the sample size was estima
ted to account for the fact that some women would be unable to use the
tub. The experimental group of 393 women was offered the tub during l
abor and the control group of 392 women received conventional care. Re
sults: No births occurred in the tub. The tub group required fewer pha
rmacologic agents than controls (66% vs 59%, p = 0.06), experienced fe
wer deliveries by forceps and vacuum (p = 0.019), and were more likely
to have an intact perineum than the standard-care group (p = 0.019).
Labor was longer for the tub group (p = 0.003), who coincidentally wer
e more primiparous and in earlier labor on admission. No differences w
ere noted in the low rates of maternal and newborn signs of infection
in women with ruptured membranes. A subset of mothers expressed satisf
action with the tub experience and labor support. The cesarean rate am
ong both groups was lower (8.9%) than our overall rate (16.6%) during
the study period Conclusions: Whirlpool baths in labor have positive e
ffects on analgesia requirements, instrumentation rates, condition. of
the perineum and personal satisfaction. Further study of the effects
on labor length, pain, influence of labor support, and psychological o
utcomes is being planned.