The news that one of the company's senior managers is leaving comes as
a complete surprise to Paul Simmonds, CEO of Kinsington Textiles, Inc
. Ned Carpenter, KTI's vice president of operations for three years, w
rites in his resignation letter that he is leaving for a better opport
unity. Simmonds soon learns that Carpenter's new job is at Daltex, one
of KTI's main rivals in the intensely competitive carpet industry. Hi
ring Carpenter had helped Simmonds establish his reputation as a topno
tch manager. Carpenter came to KTI with lots of ideas and put his enth
usiasm to good use. Three years into a five-year change program, Carpe
nter had turned KTI's operations from one of the worst in the industry
to one of the best. He also had helped develop and plan the upcoming
launch of a new fiber coating - KTI's first breakthrough in years. In
this fictitious case study, Simmonds, along with the company's counsel
and vice president of human resources, must figure out how much and w
hat sort of damage control they need. What are they going to tell the
company's employees and the media! Should they immediately replace Car
penter with John Brady, the second-in-command of operations? What if C
arpenter is taking KTI employees - and strategic information - with hi
m to Daltex? Should Simmonds ask all his managers to sign noncompete a
greements - something Carpenter was never asked to dot Should KTI sue
Carpenter? Five experts offer advice about communicating with KTI's em
ployees, the media, and Carpenter himself, and about protecting the co
mpany's confidential information.