Mhs. Huang et al., THE DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS OF POSTERIOR PLAGIOCEPHALY - TRUE LAMBDOIDSYNOSTOSIS VERSUS POSITIONAL MOLDING, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 98(5), 1996, pp. 765-774
The diagnosis and treatment of posterior plagiocephaly is one of the m
ost controversial aspects of craniofacial surgery. The features of tru
e lambdoid synostosis versus those of deformational plagiocephaly seco
ndary to positional molding are inadequately described in the literatu
re and poorly understood. This has resulted in many infants in several
craniofacial centers across the United States undergoing major intrac
ranial procedures for non-synostotic plagiocephaly. The purpose of thi
s study was to describe the detailed clinical, imaging, and operative
features of true lambdoid synostosis and contrast them with the featur
es of positional plagiocephaly. During a 4-year period from 1991 to 19
94, 102 patients with posterior plagiocephaly were assessed in a large
multidisciplinary craniofacial program. During the same period, 130 p
atients with craniosynostosis received surgical treatment. All patient
s were examined by a pediatric dysmorphologist, craniofacial surgeon,
and pediatric neurosurgeon. Diagnostic imaging was performed where ind
icated. Patients diagnosed with lambdoid synostosis and severe and pro
gressive positional molding underwent surgical correction using standa
rd craniofacial techniques. Only 4 patients manifested the clinical, i
maging, and operative features of unilambdoid synostosis, giving an in
cidence among all cases of craniosynostosis of 3.1 percent. Only 3 amo
ng the 98 patients with positional molding required surgical intervent
ion. All the patients with unilambdoid synostosis had a thick ridge ov
er the fused suture, identical to that found in other forms of cranios
ynostosis, with compensatory contralateral parietal and frontal bossin
g and an ipsilateral occipitomastoid bulge. The skull base had an ipsi
lateral inferior tilt, with a corresponding inferior and posterior dis
placement of the ipsilateral ear. These characteristics were completel
y opposite to the findings in the 98 patients who had positional moldi
ng with open lambdoid sutures and prove conclusively that true unilamb
doid synostosis exists as a specific but rare entity. Awareness of the
features of unilambdoid synostosis will allow more accurate diagnosis
and appropriate treatment of posterior plagiocephaly in general and i
n particular will avoid unnecessary surgical intervention in patients
with positional molding.