Some new examples of favorable interactions between additives in flame
retardant formulations have been found. These include the following:
phosphorus combinations such as triphenyl phosphate with a tetraphenyl
phenylene diphosphate, and char-former combinations such as novolacs
with polyphenylene oxide in styrenics, melamine with polyphenylene oxi
de and kaolinite in polyolefin elastomers; and a neopentyl phosphonate
ester with a melamine phosphate in ethylene-vinyl acetate. Useful int
eractions were detected by various tests and data analysis methods inc
luding multiple regression, and further elucidated by various analytic
al methods. Some indications of possible modes of action and explanati
ons for the interactions are presented. Barrier formation appears to p
lay an important role in these three cases, although vapor phase actio
n (possibly physical) is also noted. Rate of char formation is suggest
ed as an important variable. The systematic use of combinations of dif
ferently functioning flame retardants constitutes the 'systems approac
h' which is advocated for the solution of retardancy problems. (C) 199
6 Elsevier Science Limited