The limitations of current therapies for atrial fibrillation are forci
ng a rethinking of how they should be used. Questions are being raised
about the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, and new nonpharmacologic proce
dures are promising alternatives. Most patients with atrial fibrillati
on still require warfarin therapy, but some low-risk patients can fore
go it. KEY POINTS Sinus rhythm spontaneously returns within the first
24 hours in almost half of cases of new atrial fibrillation. Patients
with hemodynamic instability due to new-onset atrial fibrillation shou
ld proceed directly to electrical cardioversion. Warfarin therapy to m
aintain an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0 is curre
ntly recommended for all patients with atrial fibrillation with no con
traindications to it, except for patients younger than 60 years with l
one atrial fibrillation, in whom the risk of stroke is low. Certain an
tiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided in patients with congestive heart
failure, in whom the risks may exceed the benefits. The maze procedur
e is emerging as an option to restore and maintain sinus rhythm. Radio
frequency atrioventricular node ablation and modification hold promise
as options to control the ventricular rate without drugs.