Many patients are donating their own blood before surgery to avoid blo
od-borne infections, often on the advice of their physicians. But auto
logous blood transfusion, while safer than allogeneic transfusion, is
not completely risk-free. it is also expensive, its benefits are diffi
cult to assess, and its increasing popularity raises many difficult et
hical issues, such as whether the benefit of allogeneic transfusion su
pports its additional expense. KEY POINTS Record-keeping, collection,
and transfusion errors are occasional risks of autologous transfusions
. In addition, risks associated with blood donation, from mild dizzine
ss to precipitation of angina, should be considered when high-risk pat
ients are referred for autologous collection. Only approximately half
of autologous units collected are actually used, and the cost per qual
ity-adjusted year of life saved may be as high as $1 million, dependin
g on the type of surgical procedure. Although recombinant human erythr
opoietin can stimulate red blood cell production before autologous don
ation and decrease the need for transfusion, it is not clear whether t
his strategy, which can cost thousands of dollars per patient, will be
cost-effective. Perioperative hemodilution may become an important co
mponent in efforts to reduce patient exposure to allogeneic blood, but
its use remains controversial.