DIVISION-OF-LABOR IN CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY - COOPERATION AND FRAGMENTATION

Citation
T. Timpka et al., DIVISION-OF-LABOR IN CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY - COOPERATION AND FRAGMENTATION, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 10(3), 1996, pp. 157-162
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Nursing
ISSN journal
02839318
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
157 - 162
Database
ISI
SICI code
0283-9318(1996)10:3<157:DICM-C>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The aim of the study was to describe clinical microbiological practice s in a hospital setting. A grounded theory was developed from qualitat ive data in two steps: initial participant observation to describe the clinical work-flow, and a main case study based on in depth interview s and analyses of work practices using a video-based stimulated recall technique. Six physicians, 2 senior medical laboratory technologists and one head nurse were interviewed in depth based on their organizati onal positions. Stimulated recall interviews were conducted with 11 nu rses, 6 secretaries, 6 medical laboratory technologists, and 3 physici ans. An informal clinical microbiological 'workgroup' was found to co- operate around two physical objects: the microbiological sample and th e laboratory request form. Work organization was divided into planning , based on science and legislations, and performance based on traditio n and local supervision. None of the practitioners had a total overvie w of an analysis cycle, all being occupied with a discrete part of pla nning, practical work and information management. The conclusion of th e study is that fragmentation in the division of labour may be a criti cal hindrance to development in clinical microbiology. If a common str ategy is not shared between specialities and professions, even minor c hanges in routines by individual practitioners may influence patient o utcome.