Ta. Bokesoy et al., COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO HISTAMINE BY CONSTANT-FLOW AND CONSTANT-PRESSURE PERFUSION METHODS IN THE RABBIT ISOLATED KIDNEY PREPARATION, General pharmacology, 27(6), 1996, pp. 1047-1051
1. Reproducibility and sensitivity of responses of isolated perfused r
abbit renal vascular bed to bolus administration of histamine was comp
ared for the conditions of constant-flow and constant-pressure perfusi
on by Krebs-Henseleit solution. Two other vasoactive agent (noradrenal
ine and angiotensin II) were also tested in the same preparation for c
omparison with the effect of histamine. 2. In constant-pressure mode,
different hydrostatic pressures were also employed for the analysis of
time-effect phenomena. 3. Drug responses were recorded by computer an
d were evaluated as changes of perfusion pressure or flow, to correspo
nd to drug activities at the resistance vessels and, also, change of o
rgan weight, as effects on exchange and capacitance functions of the c
irculation. Both parameters were also recorded on a Grass polygraph. 4
. Reproducibility and sensitivity of responses to vasoactive agents (h
istamine, noradrenaline, angiotensin II) were significantly low in the
constant-flow conditions, compared to constant-pressure mode. 5. Resp
onsivity also deviated for different perfusion pressures of constant-p
ressure mode and 80-100 mm H2O pressure was found to be the most conve
nient value. 6. It is concluded that constant-flow and constant-pressu
re conditions provide different hydrodynamic conditions. In constant-f
low methodology, when the predetermined perfusion rate is not tolerate
d by the vascular bed, excessive flow in the circulation would lead to
depression of vasoactivity, failing pharmacodynamic equilibria and lo
ss of responsivity. Structural deviation of the vascular bed would als
o be expected due to differences of organ specimen and, probably, resu
lt in the variation of responsivity of constant-flow perfusion procedu
re.