POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER PERIPHERAL-NERVE BLOCK FOR PODIATRIC-SURGERY - CLINICAL EFFICACY AND CHEMICAL-STABILITY OF LIDOCAINE ALONE VERSUS LIDOCAINE PLUS CLONIDINE
Dj. Reinhart et al., POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER PERIPHERAL-NERVE BLOCK FOR PODIATRIC-SURGERY - CLINICAL EFFICACY AND CHEMICAL-STABILITY OF LIDOCAINE ALONE VERSUS LIDOCAINE PLUS CLONIDINE, Anesthesia and analgesia, 83(4), 1996, pp. 760-765
Postoperative analgesia may be prolonged by the addition of clonidine
to local anesthetic solutions used for regional anesthesia. The purpos
e of this study was to test this hypothesis in a clinical trial of pat
ients undergoing pediatric surgery. The study design was prospective,
double-blinded, and randomized. Ninety ASA physical status I or II pat
ients scheduled for bunionectomy or hammer toe repair were randomized
to receive ankle or metatarsal blocks with plain 1.73% lidocaine (Grou
p L), 1.73% lidocaine with 10 mu g/mL, of clonidine added (Group C-10)
, or 1.73% lidocaine with 20 mu g/mL clonidine (Group C-20). Time from
the performance of the block to 1) loss of sensation to pinprick, 2)
return of sensation to pinprick, 3) onset of postsurgical pain, and 4)
time of first oral pain medication intake were recorded. Beginning at
1 h after the completion of the block, visual analog scale (VAS) and
verbal pain scores were recorded every 30 min. Additional postoperativ
e oral pain medication required in the first 9 h after the block was a
lso recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze intergr
oup differences in the VAS and verbal pain scores, the time to first r
eported pain, the time to first oral pain medication, and the total am
ount of oral pain medications required. Repeated-measures ANOVA was us
ed to analyze the VAS and verbal pain scores overall and integrated as
sessment of pain scores and rescue medication was per-formed. Adverse
events were also recorded for each group. There were no differences am
ong the three groups with regard to overall VAS pain scores although G
roup C-10 had significantly better verbal pain scores after the first
3 h (P < 0.05). There was also no difference in time to loss or return
of pinprick sensation. Group C-10 had a longer time to first reported
pain (P < 0.01), a longer time to first oral pain meditation (P < 0.0
1), a lower average total dose of oral pain medication required (P < 0
.05), and a lower integrated assessment of pain and medication (P < 0.
01) than Group L. More patients in Group C-10 reported no pain postope
ratively (P < 0.01) and no pain medication taken (P < 0.01) than Group
L. Group C-20 results suggested no statistically significant improvem
ent over plain lidocaine. One patient in Group C-20 experienced signif
icant hypotension postoperatively. pH determinations and chemical anal
ysis by capillary electrophoresis showed no significant change in comp
osition of the solutions when clonidine was mixed with lidocaine and s
tored at 4 degrees C for 1 wk. Compared to 1.73% lidocaine, combining
clonidine (10 mu g/mL) with lidocaine for local anesthetic block for f
oot surgery significantly increases the duration and quality of postop
erative analgesia.