PERSISTENCE OF THE AML1 ETO FUSION TRANSCRIPT IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR T(8-21) LEUKEMIA/

Citation
J. Jurlander et al., PERSISTENCE OF THE AML1 ETO FUSION TRANSCRIPT IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR T(8-21) LEUKEMIA/, Blood, 88(6), 1996, pp. 2183-2191
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology
Journal title
BloodACNP
ISSN journal
00064971
Volume
88
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
2183 - 2191
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-4971(1996)88:6<2183:POTAEF>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The AML1/ETO fusion transcript is expressed in virtually all patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The fusion transcr ipt can be detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in most of these patients in long-term complete remission (C R) following conventional chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow trans plantation (BMT). However, AML1/ETO expression has mot been analyzed i n a series of patients following allogeneic BMT. We examined CR bone m arrow (BM) samples and, in some cases, blood samples from 10 patients with t(8;21) leukemia who underwent allogeneic BMT in either first or second remission or first or second relapse. A variety of myeloablativ e regimens were used. Eight patients received non-T-cell depleted BM f rom matched sibling donors, one patient received a T-cell depleted hap loidentical BM, and one patient received a non-T-cell depleted BM from a matched unrelated donor (MUD). Five patients developed acute and/or chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). The furthest time points an alyzed for the AML1/ETO transcript in the 10 patients in CR following allogeneic BMT ranged from 7.5 to 83.0 months. Sufficient RNA was extr acted from the most recent BM or BM and blood samples from nine patien ts to assay for presence or absence of the AML1/ETO fusion transcript by RT-PCR. The fusion transcript was detected by RT-PCR in all nine of these patient samples; eight were positive in BM and one was negative in BM, but positive in blood. The fusion transcript could not be dete cted in a BM sample from the tenth patient obtained 7.5 months after B MT, but the amount of RNA available was suboptimal. Hematopoietic chim erism could be demonstrated in sorted CD34(+) BM cells from two of fou r patient CR BM samples with RT-PCR evidence of the fusion transcript. Additionally, in one of the two cases with chimerism, we demonstrated an abnormal clonal population of recipient cells in the CR BM sample by fluorescence in situ hybridization. One patient died of complicatio ns from GVHD, while the other nine patients remain alive without evide nce of relapse, with a median follow-up time of 27 (range, 7.5 to 87) months post-BMT. These data suggest that allogeneic BMT, like conventi onal chemotherapy and autologous BMT, is not sufficient to eradicate c ells expressing AML1/ETO, and that a positive RT-PCR for the fusion tr anscript post allogeneic BMT is compatible with continued CR. (C) 1996 by The American Society of Hematology.