This paper provides a cognitive grammar (Langacker 1987, 1991) investi
gation of several French complement constructions, and more specifical
ly of the distribution of infinitival/finite complements in these cons
tructions. It argues that the syntactic realization of the complement
is explained by the perspective imposed on the complement scene, persp
ective referring to the vantage point from which the scene is conceptu
alized and the viewing arrangement existing between the conceptualizer
and the entity conceptualized. Recognizing perspective enables us to
(i) distinguish medals from sentential complement constructions (SCCs)
, and (ii) explain the distribution between infinitival and finite com
plements in SCCs. With respect to (i), the subject of medals has no co
nceptualizing role with respect to the complement scene, while the sub
ject of SCC verbs acts as the conceptualizer of the complement scene.
With respect to (ii), finite complements instantiate the optimal viewi
ng arrangement (Langacker 1985), where the complement scene is viewed
objectively from the vantage point of the main subject. Infinitival co
mplements illustrate the egocentric viewing arrangement (Langacker 198
5), where the complement clause is viewed more subjectively. The distr
ibution of these complements with the main verbs involves the semantic
s of the verbs, as well as pragmatic properties of the speech situatio
n.