H. Sittek et al., DYNAMIC MR MAMMOGRAPHY - CAN THE COURSE O F SIGNAL INTENSITY INCREASEBE SUITABLE FOR DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN DIFFERENT FORMS OF MASTOPATHY, RoFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der neuenbildgebenden Verfahren, 165(1), 1996, pp. 59-63
Purpose: The capacity of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography to d
istinguish between different forms and grades of mastopathy according
to Prechtel's classification was evaluated in a retrospective study. P
atients and methods: MR mammograms of 51 patients with histologically
proven mastopathy were retrospectively evaluated in areas subsequently
biopsied. Results: Mean values of regressive and hyperplastic types o
f mastopathy differed significantly no significant differences were fo
und between proliferating acid non-proliferating mastopathies or Prech
tel grades I - III mastopathy when MRI data obtained with a FLASH 3 D
sequence (T-R = 8.4 ms, T-E = 3 ms, flip angle = 30 degrees at 1.0 T)
were compared one minute, three, 5 and 8 minutes after i.v. bolus admi
nistration of contrast media (Gd-DTPA, 0.1 mmol/kg body weight). Concl
usion: Our data indicate that dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography
does not allow the differentiation of proliferating and non-prolifera
ting mastopathy according to the Prechtel classification. Dynamic MR m
ammography assessment of breast cancer risk does not seem to be feasib
le.