Objective: To describe the mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates in
the treatment of osteoporosis and compare bisphosphonate therapy with
other treatments. Options: The bisphosphonates, etidronate, alendronat
e, clodronate, pamidronate, tiludronate, ibandronate and risedronate;
combined bisphosphonates and estrogen; combined bisphosphonates and ca
lcium supplements. Outcomes: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density
in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and imp
roved quality of life associated with bisphosphonate treatment. Eviden
ce: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined with emphasis
on recent controlled trials. The availability of treatment products in
Canada was also considered. Values: Reducing fractures, increasing bo
ne mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given
a high value. Benefits, harms and costs: Treatment with bisphosphonat
es may be an acceptable alternative to ovarian hormone therapy in incr
easing bone mass and decreasing fractures associated with osteoporosis
. Compared with estrogens, bisphosphonates are bone-tissue specific, h
ave equal or greater antiresorptive effect and have few side effects a
nd no known risk for carcinogenesis. They also hold promise in treatin
g male osteoporosis and steroid-induced bone loss. Prolonged, continuo
us treatment with etidronate may lead to impaired calcification of new
ly formed bone; therefore, etidronate is administered cyclically. This
risk is not present in newer generations of bisphosphonates. Recommen
dations: Bisphosphonate therapies may be considered as an alternative
to ovarian hormone therapy in postmenopausal osteopenic or osteoporoti
c women who cannot or will not tolerate ovarian hormone therapy. They
should also be considered in treating male osteoporosis and steroid-in
duced bone loss. Combination therapy with estrogen may be effective, a
lthough more research is needed. Combination therapy with calcium supp
lements is recommended. Bisphosphonate therapies should be restricted
to postmenopausal patients with osteopenia or established osteoporosis
and are not yet recommended for younger perimenopausal women as proph
ylaxis. Validation: These recommendations were developed by the Scient
ific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada at its 1995
Consensus Conference. The Health Protection Branch, Canada, has approv
ed etidronate and alendronate in the treatment of osteoporosis, and cl
odronate has been approved in Canada for the treatment of hypercalcemi
a-complicating malignancy. Sponsors: Sponsors of the 1995 conference i
ncluded the Dairy Farmers of Canada, Eli Lilly Canada, Inc., Hoffmann-
La Roche Canada Limited, Merck Frosst Canada Inc. and Proctor & Gamble
Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. Additional support to assist with publica
tion was provided by Proctor and Gamble Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.