C. Benedetto et al., BLOOD-PRESSURE PATTERNS IN NORMAL-PREGNANCY AND IN PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSION, PREECLAMPSIA, AND CHRONIC HYPERTENSION, Obstetrics and gynecology, 88(4), 1996, pp. 503-510
Objective: To compare the 24-hour blood pressure (BP) pattern in physi
ologic pregnancy, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, and ch
ronic hypertension. Methods: We investigated four groups of women with
singleton pregnancy: 73 controls, 48 patients with pregnancy-induced
hypertension, 38 with preeclampsia, and 53 with mild to moderate chron
ic hypertension. The 24-hour BP monitoring was performed longitudinall
y in controls and in patients with chronic hypertension, and at the ti
me of diagnosis in those with pregnancy-induced hypertension or preecl
ampsia. Results: Nineteen thousand eight hundred seventy-two BP measur
ements were analyzed. In controls, the mean values of BP indices were
lower than those first reported in nonpregnant women, and the acrophas
e was always localized in the first part of the afternoon. In pregnanc
y-induced hypertension and especially in preeclampsia, besides the obv
ious quantitative increase in BP, circadian BF oscillations were less
pronounced than in controls, and the severity of hypertension seemed t
o favor the loss of diurnal rhythm. Conversely, in chronic hypertensio
n, circadian oscillations were the same as in controls. Conclusion: St
andardized 24-hour BP monitoring during pregnancy allows quantitative
and qualitative evaluations of the hypertensive status. However, if su
ch a technique is used routinely in every clinical setting, we should
establish specific thresholds of normality for pregnancy.