Md. Mckee et al., MANAGEMENT OF HUMERAL NONUNION AFTER THE FAILURE OF LOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS, Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 10(7), 1996, pp. 492-499
We reviewed 21 cases of humeral nonunion following the failure of ''lo
cking'' humeral nails. The nails had been inserted as the primary oper
ative procedure following humeral fracture in fifteen cases or after t
he failure of closed treatment in six cases. Reconstruction after the
failure of these implants was complicated by poor bone stock and diffi
culty in achieving union. Although technically difficult, open reducti
on and internal fixation with plating and bone grafting (successful in
nine of nine cases) was more consistent than exchange nailing (succes
sful in four of 10 cases) in achieving union (p = 0.01). Two patients
refused further surgical intervention. The degree of bone loss associa
ted with a loose nail, the lack of success of exchange nailing, and th
e insertion site morbidity associated with humeral nail removal differ
entiate these nonunions from similar lower extremity problems. The deg
ree of bone loss following failed locking nailing of the humerus is a
major concern, and exchange nailing alone may not bean acceptable opti
on to deal with this problem.